Friday, March 20, 2009
Posted by: John Campbell at 8:53 AM

I firmly opposed and voted “no” on HR 1586. Let’s first understand exactly what the bill does. It imposes a 90% federal income tax on any bonus paid to any employee of any company that has received over $5 Billion in federal rescue funds. Such companies include, Bank of America, Wells Fargo Bank, Chase Bank, JP Morgan, CitiBank, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Wachovia, Washington Mutual, Countrywide, Goldman Sachs, AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac amongst others. The tax would only apply to people with total joint incomes over $250,000 or single individuals with income of over $125,000. When combined with California Income taxes which now top out at 10.55%, this can be a tax just short of 101% of the income.

Under this law, a bank teller at Wells Fargo could receive a bonus of $1,000 for doing a great job. If that bank teller was married to a physician who made $175,000 and they had some additional investment income, that bank teller would pay a tax of $1,055 on the bonus of $1,000 that they received for doing a good job. This is horrible!

This is not raising revenues, this is punishment. It is a terrible precedent to use the tax laws for punishment. If we go down this road, the government can impose a 100% tax on anyone they don’t like, or anyone they believe is paid too much. Employees of other companies, doing the same thing for the same bonus, will not receive this tax. That probably makes it unconstitutional and I hope it does.

I understand the public outrage over these bonuses and I share much of it. But this is not the way to fix it. Sue them to get the money back. But don’t do this.

You may or may not realize it, but embezzlement income is taxable today, but at normal rates. So if you steal money, you will not have a tax higher than normal. You may be forced to give the money back because you stole it, but it will not be taxed away from you. This bill makes a bonus from Bank of America a more egregious offense under the tax laws than bank robbery.

All of this was caused because we nationalized companies that are created to make a profit. Throughout time, governments have shown themselves to be particularly inept at such an enterprise. This is another example of why.



View in ascending order View in descending order
Trident Warrior writes: Friday, March, 20, 2009 9:06 AM
Maybe the Banks should question
The Congress, about their mis-deeds and failed legislation when they passed the CRA. Why aren't
any people being held responsible for forcing the banks to have to make credit default swaps
to try and break even on the toxic assets.

Most of all, the American public should hold the
leaders to higher stansard and not let them get away with trashing the Constitution.
Granite Eagle writes: Friday, March, 20, 2009 9:27 AM
I don't know which is worse
The fact that these employees got the $1Mil "retention bonuses"
OR
Geinther lying about knowing about it.
OR
Dodd denying he ever knew anything about it...after they put an amendment named after him into the bill.
OR
grand masta "o" feigning concern over it.
OR
The supposed extreme speed at which this bill had to be signed with no time for review.


This will become a constitutional battle......It SHOULD become a constitutional battle....I fear that the employees will just skulk into the dark and not try to battle this due to fear of populist reprisal.
Exeye writes: Friday, March, 20, 2009 9:35 AM
This is not America
So the question is, John Campbell, why do I owe it any more allegiance?
Brad writes: Friday, March, 20, 2009 9:40 AM
CELEBRITY PRESIDENCY: THE GREAT OBAMA SH
After yesterday's most recent episode of Celebrity Presidency, all I have to ask is: where were the Greek columns?



After the lights were dimmed, the NCAA brackets picked, the anger at AIG feigned, and the late-night joking on Leno finished, where were the CONCRETE solutions from Prezident Change to fix the banking crisis and put Americans back to work? Where was His immaculate EXPLANATION on why he signed off on the AIG bonuses?



This dog and pony show has gone too far. So has His elaborate blame game. Mr. Obummer is playing the public for a bunch of fools!



IMPEACH THIS MARXIST NOW!!!
who me just me  writes: Friday, March, 20, 2009 11:44 AM
Obama the new Schwartzenegger
Obama is going to be in a movie (if we still make movies) in a few years. He is the same as Arnold, just doing things in reverse.
Pat writes: Monday, March, 23, 2009 7:53 AM
Limit what Oprah makes!!
Thank you Congressman Campbell! This war on who makes how much has got to STOP! If O wants to limit who makes what, why not start with how much Presidents can get for book deals, how often Speakers of House can use military aircraft, and on and on and on. How about how much Oprah can make in a year? How much college
basketball players can get for signing bonuses? I have always hated the class envy warfare pitched by the Dems, and now taken to the extreme by Mr. O. Where will it end? When we all receive our gray suits from the Dictator of the US? The arrogance and hypocrisy of this administration is revolting, and must continue to be STRONGLY OPPOSED.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

About John Campbell

John Campbell is a member of the House Financial Services Committee, and has taken a leadership role in addressing the country's top economic issues. Campbell serves as a member of the Joint Economic Committee, and House Committee on the Budget. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Economics from UCLA and a Master's Degree in Taxation from USC.

Create You Own Blog on Townhall.com - IT'S EASY Search User Blogs on Townhall.com :: Where Your Opinion Counts
Young America
Young America's Foundation
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast