...a bipartisan force of senators stood up against the god emperor! It is a historic day, indeed!
But I thought that the emperor won and was therefore entitled to his spoils. What happened?
Most likely, though, the RINO and dem senators in opposition did not receive enough earmarks of their own. |
|
|
Something is getting through to these Senators! We have to tighten our belts at home, they need to do the same! |
|
|
Under what time frame? Before he got the nomination,before he won the election,after he won,last week or today? Will some one just hold this snake down for 5 mins so we can catch a breath! |
|
|
Liberals never practice what they preach. It's more like, "it's OK for me", but not for thee. Or, "do as I say, not as I do" mentality that we see daily right here in the comments sections by theleftie trolls that are ever present (for whatever reason). |
|
|
There is no way he will veto this bill, in any form. He wasn't more government control and that's what the bill does. |
|
"Either way, President Obama should veto this bill unless the nearly 9,000 earmarks are taken out."
Right. Presidents customarily follow the recommendations of congressmen from the other party. |
|
|
again and again. It's their obstruction, of course, based on a miniscule percentage of the bill that THEY helped insert! Ridiculous. Reid should end the filibuster and be done with the asinine irrelevant Party's obstructionist dithering. |
|
|
..when a bill scares even the Dumbocrats. |
|
You can put all the blame on the GOP all you want.
Its not their fault that they know its a waste of Money because Obama said it was during the campaign, they are just following his lead.
|
|
|
Who was "The One" that campaigned on the promise to go over the budget "line by line" and "remove" any and all earmarks? Was it a promise or just more of the same old bulls.hit? |
|
|
|
|
Obama will veto this bill is if the teleprompter writer tells him to. |
|
"Right. Presidents customarily follow the recommendations of congressmen from the other party." ~bladdermsmear estrogen
"...and be done with the asinine irrelevant Party's obstructionist dithering." ~ Waylaid
"The omnibus spending bill, which wraps in a number of spending bills not passed in 2008, opens up trade and travel to Cuba, a move that incited the ire of Cuban-born Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., and Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., whose state contains a large number of Cuban-born Americans opposed to lifting the embargo."
"Menendez, who favors the current embargo, as well, said in a floor speech on Monday that the provisions are "so deeply offensive to me and so deeply undemocratic that it puts the omnibus appropriation package in jeopardy despite of all of the other important funding that this bill would provide." ~Fox News
You have to marvel at these liberal troll twins and how ill informed they are.
We suggest that bladdersmear estrogen and Waylaid call El Rushbo and ask him to send you radios so you can tune in to his talk show and be accurately informed as to what is happening in the world. |
|
|
can't quite coax or sway or charge his colleagues to spend this country into oblivion! |
|
"Who was "The One" that campaigned on the promise to go over the budget "line by line" and "remove" any and all earmarks?"
I don't know, McCain? Show me where Obama said that. It would be curious if he did, since the president can't "remove" earmarks from a bill. |
|
Dow's Decline Is Fastest for a New President in Nearly a Century
The Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen 20 percent since President Obama took the oath of office.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/06/stu dy-dow-decline-marks-fastest-new-president-nearly-century/
|
|
In fact,Democrats got us into an economic guagmire!
|
|
|
|
his gestapo propaganda, because Communism is now at our door. If the Democrats get these laws (below) past, no one will be allowed to work in this country, unless they belong to a labor union! All the hiring and firing will be done by the unions, not the employer.just as it was with the Communist Party. Not afraid yet, have someone check your pulse, you may be dead already!
Those who are elected to "tell you whether or not you can keep your job", will be elected by "open ballot" or otherwise known as "Check Card", which means, those who told you whom to vote for (I remember when this was the "law of the land" and a lot of good people were destitute, because they refused to "yield to gangsterism"), will know how you voted, so they can "remove you from your job", if you didn't vote as you were told!
See, with Communism they just shoot you. |
|
|
Obama is doing what democrats typically do. It isn't what they do that counts, its what they say they are going to do. Don't you get it? |
|
With "Mandatory Unionization and Check Card" they just throw you out in the street (if you don't vote how they tell you) and your family starves, because you are destitute and you won't be able to get another job anywhere. Uunder this law (the Democrats have assured the unions they will pass), the unions control "all" of the job hiring in the country! If you can't see
"totalitarianism" coming, perhaps it's time to get a pair of glasses. In Colorado, the first "hurdle" has already been passed, to this "New Brand of Communism", when a "Right To Work Law" was voted down, (after deceptive ads were run repeatedly, at the direction of the big labor unions and Democrat politicians) in the November elections. America is in a lot of trouble and I hope the majority can see it before it's too late! Times are going to be tough for the next 10 to 20 years and if labor unions control all the jobs, as it was during the "Great Depression of the 30' and 40', no one works except by approval of the unions! People with a brain should be appalled at what else was demanded/required of them, as a "condition to remain employed"! People were forced to do/commit things that were repugnant to them or else, you get the idea, just to keep their jobs! It's coming HERE soon, if the citizens don't resolve to stop this "heinous act" from becoming the "Law of The Land"!
Say, "Thank you Comrade Obama" |
|
|
I am glad to see that more democrates are stopping to think, even though they listened to Pelosi and jumped on the vote. Especially when we all know they don't even KNOW what they voted for. The can condem people who didn't read the contracts before they bought a home, BUT what they did is OUTRAGOUS. I am sick of how they feel it's their DUTY to bury tax payers for the next 40 years,. Also Obama can spend government money,{ we don't have} and eat and party, travel to Camp David, heat up the White House to all his liking, WITHOUT regards for the people who are loosing their homes. jobs, and not knowing how they will survive. This show we the people how little regard he feels for the TAX payers and even those who are on welfare. One thing is funny, he cranks up the heat on The White House that is heated with COAL, yet he wants to shut the coal industry down, and thousands will loose jobs, and our energy costs will be so high, we won't be able to pay for them.Wait till he turns on the Air Conditioning.He is definatly living the life of " do as I say, not as I do" Hypocrite... |
|
"Thanks - now that I know we can vulgarize other people's screen names, I'll bear you in mind."
You just noticed? It's been going on even since you unloaded your first wagon full of night soil here at TH. You are one observant guy! |
|
|
|
he is. he is the ultimate elitist. do as i say not as i do. he knows alot better than us dummies.
what should we do? we should do like he did when he sat in racist wright's "church"; don't pay attention (as he said he did; yea right).
just words, just speeches,
roy |
|
Here is part of the transcript of the presidential debate where he said he would go line by line:
2008 first presidential debate, at Ole Miss: on Government Reform
Source: 2008 first presidential debate, Obama vs. McCain Sep 26, 2008
Barack Obama: Eliminating earmarks isn’t enough; but I’ll check every line
McCAIN: Obama suspended requests for pork barrel projects after he was running for president. He didn’t happen to see that light there in the first three years as a member of the US Senate. Obama [says the earmark total of] $18 billion is not a lot of money. Do you know it’s tripled in the last five years? Do you know it’s gone completely out of control, to the point where it corrupts people? It corrupts people. That’s why we have people under federal indictment and charges. It’s a system that’s got to be cleaned up. I have fought against it.
OBAMA: Nobody is denying that $18 billion is important. Absolutely we need earmark reform. And when I’m president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely. But the fact is that eliminating earmarks alone is not a recipe for how we’re going to get the middle class back on track.
|
|
Ayn Rand back again -
"Absolutely we need earmark reform. And when I’m president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely. But the fact is that eliminating earmarks alone is not a recipe for how we’re going to get the middle class back on track."
He doesn't say he's going to get rid of earmarks, does he? He told Pelosi and Reid he didn't like all the earmarks in the omnibus bill, didn't he? |
|
Barack Obama's camp"aign was "West Wing" writ large. Instead of Bartlett for America" it was "Hope and Change". We never got any policy statements from him other than "Hope and Change". Everything he said in the debates was contradicted elsewere in speeches (e.g look at his gun rights in PA vs. his speech before liberals in SF about "clinging to their guns". In fact his supporters denied his past actions: e.g. the born alive act in IL he stopped; yet his supporters made excuse after excuse for what was a position which is so anti-child and generally immoral that the nation should have risen up and ridden him out on a rail rather than making him President.
You are not going to see anything out of him other than being a poll-driven Socialist/Communist. The polls will also be of his base, not of the country. As he has already told the Republicans (who represent the 46% of the country which did not vote for him) that he won. He has surrounded himself with hard left people like Emmanuel and is going to try to make this country an "outcome fair" country. Which means that people will not have equal rights, but will have "adjusted rights" based upon what he wants to do to level the outcome. |
|
Wikipedia scrubs Obama's eligibility
Wikipedia, the online "free encyclopedia" mega-site written and edited entirely by its users, has been deleting within minutes any mention of eligibility issues surrounding Barack Obama's presidency, with administrators kicking off anyone who writes about the subject, WND has learned.
Find out the latest right now at WND.com.
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91114
TODAY'S WND POLL:
What do you think of Wikipedia scrubbing Obama's page of negative information?
http://forums.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=354 |
|
"Wikipedia, the online "free encyclopedia" mega-site written and edited entirely by its users, has been deleting within minutes any mention of eligibility issues surrounding Barack Obama's presidency."
Gosh, that's a shame. The birth-certificate hounds are among the Democrats' best fund-raisers. |
|
"Well there goes our freedom of speech."
Junior high was such a long time ago, but I forget the part where posting on the internet without fear of editing or deletion is a constitutional right. |
|
"Wikipedia ... has been deleting within minutes any mention of eligibility issues surrounding Barack Obama's presidency"
So have the various courts and judges, although they're not quite as quick.
And the most recent one, a couple of days ago, ruled that the birthers must show cause why they should not pay all the defendant's court costs and lawyer fees. Obama's lawyer could end up turning a tidy profit. Hope you all contributed. |
|
|
screws you up so bad with the rest of the country (and he will) and you will finally be forced admit what a joke and a failure he actually is, I would give anything to see your ignorant, liberal brainwashed face. Your steadfast, however misguided support of a black power dictator who doesn't know sh!t about sh!t to not have to abide by the laws of this land tells the world that you share the same gestapo tactics as that man you worship, through your Media clouded brain, and that you don't have the mental capacity to actually think for yourself. Also, I contend that ANYONE who does not want to see the Constitution upheld is a treasonous piece of Anti-American Vermin who should be deported from our country, poste haste - as they would have been in the days of the men who actually had any balls. You are a pathetic specimen of an American and the forefathers would have had your sorry asss hanged had you lived during their time, and I would have loved to be there to see it. |
|
|
We seem to have acquired a "permanent guest" on the Townhall blogs whose initials are "bm" (no surprise there). The person's unique contribution is sending in posts attacking other Townhall readers. It's unlikely that your response will change his mind, since he's been doing this since last year, before the election-- maybe even longer. Responding to him just takes up space in the Comments section and wastes everyone's time. Just ignore him. |
|
When will the hypocrites in the GOP realize that we are on to their hypocrisy? Come on, nearly half the "earmarks" are THEIRS, after all! No doubt in wingnut logic the half that aren't GOP compiled are the ones needing to be axed. If ever there was a need for ending the filibuster, the Party of irrelevance and stone-hearted obstruction makes that argument very clearly.
Time to stop appeasing those who openly promote the end-of-times illogic. Will you guys please get "Raptured" away, already? It can't happen soon enough for the rest of us to get on with doing the dirty work of cleaning up after the clownish Party of Limbaugh. |
|
|
... it's not actually Wikipedia, the organization itself, that is removing references to Obama's questionable birth records, it's actually a private citizens with editing privileges. |
|
|
The only fiscal spending this guy has done,is cut back gift spending for heads of governments real shrude another dumn move???? |
|
Apparently this is a pattern on Wikipedia... See Gunny G bloggin' on his past attempts to correct the record...
http://noliberalspin.blogtownhall.com/ |
|
Why should he practice what he preaches? There is absolutely no incentive. He can do what ever he wants and the American public will re-elect him in a minute. Too many, too deceived to figure what is happening until it is too late.
Also, with half the US population dependent upon the government through jobs or assistance why would the majority ever want anything different? |
|
|
On the campaign trail, Obama told us we are not going to be able to drive our SUVs and keep our thermostats at 72 and other countries are going to be OK with that. Its not going to happen. Then, in one of the first stories that broke after the inauguration, his Chief of Staff is quoted as saying Obama keeps the White House hot enough to grow orchids. So who among you actually expect him to practice anything that he preaches? |
|
|
...are incapable of practicing what they preach. They say one thing and then do another. To them, keeping campaign promises is dirty politics. Back when Newt Gingrich came out with the Contract With America, Democrats complained that Republicans kept the promises that they made, calling it dirty politics. One Democrat went so far as to say, "Making promise is one thing but to actually keep those promises is something else. It smacks of dirty politics." It's why, when a Democrat promises something I take it for granted that they are lying. I wouldn't believe Barack Obama if he said his name was Barack Obama. And, you know something? It probably isn't. |
|
....about earmarks....
....about transparency....
....about appointments....
....about lobbyists....
....about "line-by-line"....
....about the Constitution....
enough said....
LET THE IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS BEGIN! |
|
|
This was supposed to be the second helping of porkulus! Wha hoppen? Did Spector, Collins and Snowe suddenly get religion? |
|
|
Thanks for that information. |
|
what a clown you remain
But it is the messiah who said he would not sign bills with earmarks. He never said he would only reject bills with repub earmarks he said he would sign bills with earmarks.
Yet the close to $800 billion porkzilla is loaded with 90% pork;
The truth is the messiah is not only a hypocrite but a status quo dim who fully supports tax and spend plans. Plus he acts the typical dim who is the lackey of the unions, the lawyers and the special interest groups and victim groups the dims owe their election victories to
But why should anyone be surprised by your attitude to support the messiah. The new racism is the dims holding the messiah to a lower standard of accomplishment and attacking any criticism of their savior as racist attacksThe truth remains the messiah is ill equipped to handle the job and will soon resort to the role of victim when he doesn't get his way.
In the meantime we see him living large, enjoying the perks of office and planning not only to grow gov't and give gov't an 8% across the board increase in spending while he lectures america they must cut back and make sacrifices.
Too bad the messiah only lectures and can't make the sacrifices he tell working americans they must make |
|
Obama holds up a loaf of bread: the very loaf you baked, you grew the wheat, you crushed the wheat, gathered the firewood, etc.
With that evils smirk on his face he says: NOW your wee little kids are very hungry, starving in fact: so for 1/3rd of this “LOAF OF BREAD” you will do: xyz and so on___>>>>>>>
YOU object, “it is against my principles, my character, my ethics, and besides that is the very loaf of bread you took from me”!
He raises his finger and flashes that evil smirk, there a millions as hungry as you are. YOU need to “share” and you will be rewarded with 1/3rd for doing exactly as I say if not your kids will starve and it will be your fault.
|
|
|
Watch what Obama does, not what he says. He does not practice what he preaches. Only stupid people still believe what he says. |
|