Thursday, January 24, 2008
Posted by: John Campbell at 2:00 PM

As a dedicated fiscal conservative, I always favor allowing taxpayers to keep more of their own money. But the current stimulus package being discussed would entail an overall increase in transfer payment spending and would not effectively stimulate the economy.    

It is important to realize that the current crisis is a result of a capital and credit crisis, not a consumer spending one.  In order to tackle the crisis head on, I joined my colleagues in the RSC to introduce the Economic Growth Act of 2008.

The Economic Growth Act of 2008 is designed to provide growth-oriented, permanent incentives for economic activity across the board.  This package will result in sustained growth with long-term implications.  This will ensure that Washington takes a back seat to Main Street and job creators are empowered to do what they do best—create jobs.

This legislation contains four main provisions:

  • Full, Immediate Expensing.  The bill would allow all businesses to immediately expense—or fully deduct on their tax returns—the costs of assets (including buildings) they purchase for their business in the year that they buy such assets (“Section 179” expensing).  Under current law, businesses can only take limited deductions in pieces, over several years.  By uncapping and accelerating the expensing, this provision would encourage the purchase of assets with which to grow a business.
  • Significant Reduction in the Top Corporate Tax Rate.  The bill would immediately cut the top corporate income tax rate from 35% to 25%, aligning it with the average rate in the European Union.  By allowing businesses to keep more of the money they earn, this provision would encourage the expansion of businesses, the hiring of more workers, and an acceleration of investment, while making American companies more competitive internationally.
  • End the Capital Gains Tax on Inflation.  The bill would index for inflation the cost basis used when calculating the capital gains tax on assets acquired before the end of 2008.  Under current law, the capital gains tax is based on the difference in the original purchase price of the asset and the sale price of the asset.  However, some of this difference, or “gain,” can be attributed to inflation.  By effectively reducing the amount of a gain that is taxable, this provision would encourage the movement of capital in 2008 and spur voluminous economic investment.
  • Simplify the Capital Gains Rate Structure.  The bill would allow corporations to benefit from the 15% capital gains rate.  Under current law, individuals pay a top capital gains rate of 15%, but corporations are subject to a 35% top rate.  By encouraging corporations to sell unwanted assets, this provision would unleash funds and materials with which to create jobs and grow the economy.


View in ascending order View in descending order
Blanche writes: Thursday, January, 24, 2008 9:14 PM
Stimulus...
The reason that I don't want to give Big Business a tax break is simple: Because they are going to take that money & invest it the factories they have in Communist China. They don't deserve that money unless they are going to create jobs here in the U.S.
soulsamurai writes: Friday, January, 25, 2008 4:15 AM
This is just a band aid
It doesn't fix the problem. Whatever happened to leadership? A long-term strategy & plan as well as short-term stimulus?

I personally like A FAIR DEAL FOR ALL AMERICANS:

http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Blogs.View&Blog_id= 1178
sparko_one writes: Friday, January, 25, 2008 6:54 AM
hmmmm, blance
so tell me is this not true? Do you think if lowering the tax rates on companies much lower would help them here to hire here? Or do you suppose that keeping corp taxes as about the highest in the world just helps "big business" just to keep looking elsewhere to hire workers and build plants?
TheHistorian writes: Friday, January, 25, 2008 6:56 PM
So everybody agrees?
The $600 rebate is a bad idea? I think it is just income redistribution like the Socialist Workers Party, AKA the Democrats, wants to enact with health care and anything else that is good in this country.

I was sad to see that Congressman Campbell didn't reference the Congressional Budget Office study which says that it would be better to put in a "holiday" for the Social Security tax like Schumer wants than this cut. Not a word is in the study about the long term disadvantage of increasing the Social Security deficit (now at ~$20 trillion); just how good it would be for the economy because people would be likely to spend it. It is about time that this group of CBO liberals get the door. The Republicans should have cleaned them out like the Travel Office was under Bill Clinton. Go read this junk; it makes greenhouse gas warming sound scientific!
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8932/01-22-TestimonyEcon Stimulus.pdf.

Attila writes: Saturday, January, 26, 2008 2:31 PM
Tax Equity Needs to be Considered
The problem with these proposals is that they only address the perverse incentives attributable to excessively high tax rates on capital. As you reduce taxes on one activity, but not on the other-you get income and substitution effects. Charlie the stockbroker quits selling stocks and concentrates on managing his personal portfolio. Larry the lawyer buys an expensive electronic speech recognition system rather than pay a secretary to take dictation. I remember reading that there were significant substitions of capital for labor back in the days when accelerated expensing was inroduced in the 80's-and that was no where near immediate full expensing.

Its funny, many religions discuss tithing and provide tithing (10%) as sufficient to repay divine providence-why the Federal goverment needs 39.6% is beyond me.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

About John Campbell

John Campbell is a member of the House Financial Services Committee, and has taken a leadership role in addressing the country's top economic issues. Campbell serves as a member of the Joint Economic Committee, and House Committee on the Budget. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Economics from UCLA and a Master's Degree in Taxation from USC.

Create You Own Blog on Townhall.com - IT'S EASY Search User Blogs on Townhall.com :: Where Your Opinion Counts
Young America
Young America's Foundation
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast