|
See, this bill is what we call an unlawful order because it violates far too many provisions of the Constitution. Therefore, it can be safely ignored. Which means any of you jackbutts attempting to collect monies or disenroll us from our chosen health care could be met with a surprisingly strong reaction. Just saying. |
|
State's Rights.
This is a relatively new effort by the Left---to engage such a concept, after all, they have never been ardent supporters of, States Rights in the past. It is their strongly held belief that the federal government "shall" remain in control over the rights of individual states.
Even more laughable in this 2,000 page piece is the idea of giving the states the ability to "opt out". Of course, if they do, they will forego all federal assistance. It is the ultimate incentivizing ploy, for them to jump on board the, Messiah's Gravy Train. |
|
do you think "more" or "less" Rush Limbaugh will help your cause in persuaing these democrats?
The Bill will pass EASILY in the house-39 dems is not just wriggle room-that's an open doorway. Too bad you fellows can't capitalize on it because no sane Dem no matter how blue wants to be seen in the same boat-err shipwreck-that is todays GOP.
Nice try, but forget it. |
|
Why do you hate America so much?
This is poorly written, just like Crap and Tax is, yet you stupidly stand behind it because of your adoration of Princess P?
Thanks for helping to ruin the country. Idiocracy, here we come. (rent the movie to remind yourself)... |
|
|
|
|
Serous question. Have you always been this stupid? |
|
|
and you Marxists can make it do anything. You don't even accept the definition of "is," so I can't wait to see how you absolutely twist this abortion into something so unrecognizable even you can't keep a straight face. Again, unlawful orders, those "shalls," and unenforceable. I hope you're stupid enough to try. |
|
Iit is you that never has anything valid to offer. Like so many of your loony friends you fail to look at facts. One of the reasons that you guys hate Fox so much.
This bill will not be deficit neutral. As has been pointed out on numerous occasions the numbers are based on 3-5 years of additional tax collection prior to implementation. If one was to accurately score this bill, let me make this simple for you, if they scored it based on 5 years of expenditures and 5 years worth of actual collections the cost would be enormous. Even a simpleton like you should be able to understand that, but obviously we give you too much credit.
|
|
in other words the wing nuts now no longer believe the CBO which is just so convienent.
they dont lie; when things don't go their way they decide the numbers are wrong. The idiot you're talking to did the same thing with the DOW months ago-now not a chrip about that number-its no longer relavent due to the inability to use it against Obama.
A Pretty common and see through tactic. |
|
So do some of that magic math Val and show us that 10 years of collections for five years of services works out over the long term. Show us just how the next ten years will add up. You know when they have to actually pay ten years of bills with ten years of income. Give us a detailed description of how that is going to work.
We will all wait for a detailed, sensible answer.
HAHAHA |
|
Backpeddle? More like dig deeper!
Sarah "death Panels" Palin is another good example of that! these people love to double down on stupid.
Hey- politico had an article where they said Palin's facebook page had more sway than the enitre GOP leadership!
|
|
Let's spend $900 billion so we can save $104 billion.Talk about fuzzzzzy math.This must be something that al ghore would do.I'm glad I don't have him as my CPA.Needling the unwashed masses.CVA64 |
|
|
Yes libs are great with fuzzy math. I also love that they forget that states will be forced to add more to their medicaid rolls. Seems that most of the states are in a lot of financial trouble right now and have raised taxes to cover their already bulging over runs. Well just think aside from the great federal tax raises we will also see states raise taxes. So much for the 95%. Are these libs really this stupid? |
|
We're going to pass a health care plan written by a committee, whose head says he doesn't understand it,passed by a Congress that hasn't read it but exempts themselves from it, signed by a president that also hasn't read it, and who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What possibly could go wrong?
|
|
|
Bush left a deficit of 440 billion. Now what is the new deficit projected for Obama and his plans. Trillions, oh gee wonder who spent more. You are really stupider than anyone thought. By the way tax cuts have always proven to help the economy, you do know that the more spendable income people or businesses have the more they pump into the economy and the more jobs are created. Oh you would not know that, only someone with a brain would. |
|
|
Well said but certainly not something the loony left will question. |
|
Funny how these morons want to talk about medicaid-hmmmm there nothing in the John Boehner approavd health care plan cutting medicaid costs-oh that's right these are from the same people who arl rove talked into getting on board with Medicaid part d and no child left behind because they would help with the ruling plan of the permament majority-they have no room to question anybody's intelligence as far as spending recklessly goes-the last eight years are not the model for fiscal conservatism even ignoring the war cost.
But that's the true nature of the beast they are the same people who would spend another trillion in iraq over spending once cent on social programs in the own country.
Sad and another reason why they voted out of power in 2006 and 2008. |
|
Val and Monkey Girl Why don't you fuc*ing read the bill instead of spewing what you know nothing about? Fox news has nothing to do with the useful idiots who follow the Pied Piper and his minions over the cliff with their eyes shut.
I have gotten through half of it, and so far there are no misconceptions from Fox. Just because you two monkeys want socialized medicine, does that mean you follow it blindly? READ THE EFFING BILL. Or not. Because the truth sure does hurt you, doesn't it? |
|
Could not have said it better. Well put. |
|
Utter nonsense that you will actually be paying as much as 26k per year in the future for "free" health care, hmmm?
This is because the law requires that young, middle class, relatively healthy people buy insurance which subsidizes the health care of the very ill. Similarly, the 2.5%-of-income penalties are also taxes, and are imposed under the Internal Revenue Code and enforced by the IRS.
For individuals earning over $44,000, there will be no relief to help them pay for the roughly $10,000 in premiums which even individuals will be required to pay. And families in the $88,000-$250,000 range, which Obama pledged not to tax, would experience annual “income transfer” insurance premium bills climbing to almost $26,000 -– again without relief. (courtesy of Michael Hammond) What is income transfer, in essence? Re-distribition of wealth. Yes, utter nonsense to you freaks who voted for the Pied Piper. You still don't get it. |
|