Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Posted by: John Campbell at 12:30 PM

Today I was joined by my fellow members of the Republican Study Committee in introducing the Spending Limit Amendment to the Constitution, one of the 4 legs that will become the “Taxpayer Bill of Rights”.

The undeniable fact remains that the projected growth of federal spending across the board is at an unsustainable rate.  It will threaten the standard of living of our children and grandchildren.  By the year 2040, taxes would have to double in order to pay for all of the federal spending that will compound if no action is taken.

The Spending Limit Amendment has several provisions designed at tackling the fiscal problems in the United States, here are the most prominent:

1.)It puts a lid on Federal Spending- Limits federal spending from growing faster than the nominal GDP.  Thus capping federal spending at 20.0% of GDP.

2.)It requires the President’s Budget to comply with the spending Limit- Requires the President’s annual budget submission to have an overall spending total that complies with the spending limit.

3.)Prevents gimmicks to get around Cap- Prevents Congress from creating a new accounting system that disregards some spending to get around the cap, for instance the vaunted Democrat PAY-GO principle.

4.)Exception for 2/3rds vote of Congress- The Congress may suspend the limit for any reason with a 2/3rds vote of both Houses.

5.)Effective Date- This would take effect the second fiscal year after ratification.  For example: if the amendment were ratified prior to September 30, 2008, it would be effective for FY 2010.

6.) Exception for Declaration of War- The spending limit requirement is waived for any year that a declaration of war is in effect.

The Spending Limit Amendment will prove instrumental in ensuring fiscal restraint and discipline in the federal spending process.



View in ascending order View in descending order
Wendy writes: Tuesday, April, 15, 2008 1:53 PM
Two comments
First, the exception for war is a permanent out for politicians at this time. The exception should read "total war" instead of "declaration of war."

Second, there should be a separate limit on deficit spending. While #1 is obviously more important, there is no provision requiring a balanced budget. You may not think this is important, but it is, because it is very conceivable that there could be a discrepancy between tax receipts and federal budget. In other words, I don't want politicians grandstanding about tax cuts in order to pretend to be a conservative, then undermine everything by overspending.
ClaireSolt writes: Wednesday, April, 16, 2008 11:53 AM
20% is too much
I have the same objection to Fair Tax proposals. Reform should come first and eliminate waste, first.
IGoCommando writes: Wednesday, April, 16, 2008 5:33 PM
Wendy
Declaration of War is total war. Example-- The Persian Gulf, Vietnam, nor the Iraq war had declarations. There was only Congressional authorizations re: military force. Using 'declaration of war' language is exactly what is necessary so politicians won't get a free pass.

I am completely with you re: a balanced budget provision.

20% of this country's GDP getting sucked down by the federal govt. is too high, but at least this is a start.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

About John Campbell

John Campbell is a member of the House Financial Services Committee, and has taken a leadership role in addressing the country's top economic issues. Campbell serves as a member of the Joint Economic Committee, and House Committee on the Budget. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Economics from UCLA and a Master's Degree in Taxation from USC.

Create You Own Blog on Townhall.com - IT'S EASY Search User Blogs on Townhall.com :: Where Your Opinion Counts
Young America
Young America's Foundation
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast