Thursday, January 29, 2009
Posted by: John Campbell at 11:09 AM
Last night, the House of Representatives passed a “so-called” stimulus bill, without any Republican support.? In my previous posting, I explained why this bill is not, and will not be stimulative.? In fact, I am not even calling it a stimulus bill, I am calling it a “big spending bill”, because that is exactly what it is.

I know it is easy to criticize, and not offer alternatives, but don’t worry, I have my own ideas on what should have been included in the stimulus package. ?

The main part of any stimulus should be to create consumer demand for homes and cars. This economy will not recover until the housing and car markets find a bottom and start rising again. An up-to-$25,000 refundable tax credit for the purchase of a house (new or existing) and an up to $4,000 credit for a new car, coupled with aggressive loan rates from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (4.5% or less), would get a lot of people to overcome their economic fears and take advantage of a great deal.

These should be short-term (no more than 10 months), and then phase out. Obviously, no sub-prime stuff here. This would only be for people with the ability to make real down payments and who have real credit.

That should be put together with a short-term Capital gains tax holiday, in order to get capital to move to more efficient uses.

It is also important to include some infrastructure spending such as creating a national Wi-Fi broadband system, which would generate huge job creation as the tech sector figures out new ways to use that capability.

These are things that will create many downstream jobs in the private sector that are sustainable and would also serve to settle down the panic that is now out there in the minds of consumers, rather than creating a one-time, feel-good government job.

It is frightening if one of your neighbors has lost his job and another her home; but? if one neighbor comes home in a new car and another rents their house out because they just bought a new house, while you may not run out and do either of those things, you will likely at least go out to dinner.

More than anything else, businesses need a market to sell to. That is how recessions end.

This plan would cost only a fraction of the $825 billion in the Democrats’ giant spending package.

View in ascending order View in descending order
Bennett writes: Thursday, January, 29, 2009 11:35 AM
Ehh
Across the board cuts to folks and more competition in banking (which means not bailing them out) are the best options. Not directed cuts or socialist Wi-Fi.
Nee writes: Thursday, January, 29, 2009 11:37 AM
Logical
And it makes sense.
The trouble is that liberals don't really read these bills and if they do, it's with their eyes closed. They just want everyone to follow the COW's lead and it will all be OOOO-kay. It won't, not at that price. We can do better and we should.

Good ideas, but I still like Gohmert's tax break plan for all.
Dave M writes: Thursday, January, 29, 2009 11:37 AM
One mor requirement needed
There is one mor requirement.

Fannie and Freddie Mac do not need to give low percentage loans .


THEY NEED TO CEASE TO EXIST!!!!!!!
Dread writes: Thursday, January, 29, 2009 12:10 PM
Unfortunately...
This would only push us back to the status quo, with Americans, who are already in debt, incurring new debts in order to continue pushing the day of reckoning out further.

We spent beyond our means (Including, no, especially the government) and now we're facing the reality that the lifestyle we've enjoyed isn't one we can afford.

If you want an alternative plan, I would humbly suggest one that included something to restructure, write-off, or otherwise help Americans pay down their existing debt, while still maintaining enough tolerably punitive stigmas (like a credit rating hit) to avoid creating a moral hazard.
Peggy writes: Thursday, January, 29, 2009 3:16 PM
Banks Are Bailing Out of the Bailout
The emporer has no clothes. His constituents have no brains. The economy is not in the best of shape, but this stimulus will only make it worse. Read about the banks. What a riot!! Scarlett - go to Kos - or Oz or Otown - you are only asking to be beat up - you are sick.
scoobydoobydoo writes: Thursday, January, 29, 2009 5:35 PM
Voice Your Opinion at AOL Poll
Go take this poll: Does the stimulus have the support of the American people? http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2009/01/29/hot-seat- stimulus-package/
Lerxst writes: Thursday, January, 29, 2009 6:44 PM
Total irrelevance
Scarlett O'Hara writes: Thursday, January, 29, 2009 12:01 PM
remeber the RW meme of "voter fraud"?

As usual, totally irrelevant to the discussion in hand.

Focus, clown.

Are you for or against the "stimulus" bill?

Simple question. Yes or no?

geek45 writes: Thursday, January, 29, 2009 10:14 PM
What shall we call it
The Pelosi-Reid-Obama Drunken Sailor Stimulus Package.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

About John Campbell

John Campbell is a member of the House Financial Services Committee, and has taken a leadership role in addressing the country's top economic issues. Campbell serves as a member of the Joint Economic Committee, and House Committee on the Budget. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Economics from UCLA and a Master's Degree in Taxation from USC.

Create You Own Blog on Townhall.com - IT'S EASY Search User Blogs on Townhall.com :: Where Your Opinion Counts
Young America
Young America's Foundation
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast