Friday, May 16, 2008
Posted by: John Campbell at 10:41 AM

I read a lot of political discourse that is pretty tedious and boring. I never want this blog to sink to that level. I understand that there is always a risk of that when I bring up such scintillating topics as international tax policy and mortgage origination regulations. Stop yawning!

Anyway, so here is the very first Campbell Quiz. These are a few questions about current events in Congress and politics. And no, I will not make you wait until next week to find the answers. They are all at the end of each question. Good luck, have fun.......oh yeah and maybe you'll learn something you didn't know too!

1) Two weeks ago, Congress passed a "technical corrections bill" that contained hundreds of new transportation earmarks including $90 million to study a "maglev" (magnetic levitation) train. This train would run a route that is currently served by dozens of daily airline flights and at a fare of about $118. If it takes $90 million to study it, imagine what it would take to subsidize it. This train would run between:

a) New York and Washington
b) Anaheim and Las Vegas
c) Cincinnati and Cleveland
d) San Francisco and Honolulu

Answer: (b). This earmark was originally put forth by Harry Reid (D-NV) to subsidize bringing more people to Vegas. If any of you picked (d) (San Francisco and Honolulu), please stop reading this until you sober up.

2) John McCain's running mate will be:
a) Mitt Romney
b) Former Congressman from Ohio and budget director Rob Portman
c) Ralph Nader
d) I have absolutely no idea

Answer: (d), although Ralph Nader would make McCain look young and conservative

3) When Democrats took control on Congress in 2006, they ran, in part, on a platform promising to balance the budget using a procedure they call "PAYGO" where every expenditure or tax cut would be "paid for" with a tax increase or spending reduction in the same bill. They have since decided to "waive PAYGO," meaning have no offset and thereby increase the deficit on:

a) The so-called "stimulus" package
b) The new farm subsidy bill
c) The housing bail-out bill for banks and subprime mortgage holders
d) the war funding "supplemental" bill
e) all of the above

Answer: (e) The Democrat majority has waived PAYGO on virtually every major new spending program which is pushing us towards a record nominal deficit after 3 years of declining deficits before this.

4) Gas prices are at record highs. Congress has done the following things to help alleviate the "pain at the pump:"

a) Allow environmentally sensitive oil and gas exploration in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico
b) Eliminate the 75% tariff on imported ethanol and related sugar tariffs to lower the price of the most readily available alternative
c) Relax restrictions on construction of new oil refineries and nuclear power plants, not one of which (either) has been built in this country in over 30 years.
d) Lower the gas tax
e) none of the above

Answer: (e) But they have passed several bills raising taxes on domestically produced, and only domestically produced oil and gas. These tax increases either did not pass the Senate or were vetoed by the president or else the price of gas would be even higher.

5) This "do less than nothing" Congress has not done much in the last number of weeks. The following are bills that have passed the House. I made one of them up. Which one is NOT a real bill that passed the real House this year:

a) National Watermelon Month
b) National Funeral Directors and Morticians Day
c) National Take your Ferret to Work Day
d) Support the goals and ideals of National Train Day

Answer: (c) But it was a tough call wasn't it?

6) The federal government is funded each year by the passage of 12 different appropriations bills. In total, they allow the spending of about $3 trillion in the annual federal budget. The majority Democrats apparently may bring up only one or perhaps none of these bills until after a certain date for various reasons. The date and the reasons by which they may hold these bills is:

a) Until after Cinco De Mayo so that spending guilt can be assuaged with plenty of Margaritas
b) Until after Ground Hog Day so the Punxsutawney Phil can be consulted on the matter.
c) Until after Election Day because they don't want to expose earmarks and huge deficit spending increases before then.
d) Until after January so a Democrat president can spend even more.

Answer: (c) Although any of the others may have smidgen of truth in them.

7) An investigation has recently been called into the infamous "Coconut Road" earmark. This was a $10 million earmark for a new interchange in the Florida district now represented by Congressman Connie Mack (R-FL). But Congressman Mack did not request the earmark. Instead it was requested by a member of Congress from out of that state who flew there on a company plane, went to a fundraiser for him held by developers who owned the property next to the proposed interchange, and then put the earmark in a bill after the bill had passed both Houses of Congress! This Congressman recently was seen in heated conversation with Connie Mack, who opposes the earmark, on the floor of the House. The Congressman in question here is:

a) Don Young (R-Alaska)
b) John Murtha (D- Pennsylvania)
c) Millard Fillmore (Whig-New York)
d) Alan Monahan (D- West Virginia)

Answer: (a) However, (b) or (d) certainly could have done it. Since Millard Fillmore has been dead for, oh about a hundred years, he would not be allowed to vote unless he was from Louisiana or Cook County, Illinois.

8) Because of ethanol subsidies and a prohibit-ably high tariff on imported sugar and imported ethanol, corn prices have been skyrocketing. A bushel of corn is now valued at:

a) The same as 10,000 shares of Bear Sterns stock
b) The same as a gallon of gas
c) The same as one Euro
d) The same as a 1200 square foot condo in Miami
e) $5.99

Answer: (e) OK, so it's a joke.

9) The recently House-passed mortgage bill will:

a) Allow the big money center banks to sell the worst-performing of their loans to the government thereby unloading the risk on the taxpayers.
b) Create tax credits that will subsidize foreclosed homes and new homes to the detriment of existing homes owned by people who are current on their mortgages
c) Create a Billion dollar slush fund for a few huge low-income housing builders
d) All of the above

Answer: (d) I guess you can tell that I didn't like that bill very much
Well, how did you do? If you got 8 or 9 correct, you have no life and you should have my job. If you got only 1 or 2 correct, you need to read my blog or watch Fox News more often. If you got 0 correct, that means you thought there was a train from San Francisco to Honolulu and you may be eligible for food stamps.



View in ascending order View in descending order
Keith writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:03 PM
my my
Kim, is there no schol today? Or just playing hooky? Can you go a day without spewing your hatred of all things conservative?
Cuban Pete writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 12:10 PM
Kimbergirly...
...thank you for coming out in favor of increasing pork barrel spending for massive (not so much mass) transportation projects. Do you know the amount of energy it takes to run mag-lev technology? Do you know that to install such a system it would require massive excavation and, gasp, development for human use in pristine Calofornia and Nevada desert wilderness? It would also require massive increases in electrical output. Are you willing to go along with all that "sin"ful activity? (by your characterization above).
Do you leftwing sycophants ever think about the consequences of your leaders' proposals? - even in terms of YOUR OWN ideological bents?
Keith writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:03 PM
Cuban Pete
You are in target. Until 'room temperature' superconductors become reality - probably never - maglev is just a (opium)pipe dream...
hrsdad writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:38 PM
Derail this earmark (redux)
This is a boondogle, Kimberly, honest.

Business Week recently ran an item on Senator Reid’s MagLev proposal. Also the AASHTO Journal. He’s procured 54$M to date, and earmarked an additional 90$M under H.R. 1195. This funds research on a magnetic levitation rail system between Disneyland and Las Vegas. The estimate for the completed system is 12$B.

A paper on water supply alternatives was submitted as public comment to the Environmental Impact Statement for the Southern Nevada Water Authority groundwater extraction proposal. Groundwater extraction, desalination, and overland transfer were analyzed. The capital estimates for the required 180,000 acre-ft/yr of water ranged from 2$B to 4$B, with total operating costs lowest for the surface water transfer proposals. Operating the groundwater extraction or desalination would be eight to eleven times those costs.

It seems that 4$B for reliable water is more wise than 12$B for additional consumers of scarce water. Senator Reid should address the political issues with surface water transfer and/or desalination. That would be far wiser than researching the transport of additional thousands of people to a desiccating city. …unless he structures their tickets so they must bring their own water. Then the only trick will be to make sure they urinate near a treatment plant. Is that the genius behind his idea?
MerryColin writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:40 PM
Kimberly!
Poor little you getting "soaked dry" by those big, bad oil companies. Ever hear of supply and demand? You don't have to drive--- you could walk, rollerblade, skateboard, or bicycle. The fact is efficient mass transit between major cities did exist in the form of railroads; that is until the government stuck its nose in it and, as usual, screwed it all up. Further, this proposed pipe dream is not meant to relieve congestion, lessen pollution, or make travel safer within a city. It is made to take tourists to "Sin City" where those big bad casinos can "soak them dry"! Duh...tell me that you don't vote--please. I've got a better idea for 90 million bucks: use it to administer a civics test, along with an IQ test, for all potential voters. No pass No Vote!
Pasadena Phil writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:41 PM
maglev to Honolulu
Yeah that would be stupid. Who would ever willingly go to San Francisco just to catch a train to Honolulu. Not worth it. Probably catch a horrible disease.
peacefrog writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:45 PM
Cuban Pete
Don't waste your time on the little dolt. She's nothing but one big Lib talking point, with no original thought in her warped head. Notice how in her world only Right-wingers like to gamble. What a stooge!
hrsdad writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 1:50 PM
A Real Ticket
Congressman Campbell,
We need a draft.

You and Congresswoman Sue Myrick should decide who wants the Naval Observatory and who wants the White House.

Since I'm not in your district, I can't send you a direct email. Besides, this venue ought to get interesting coverage.

Thanks for your work. It's good to see there are adults in charge of some parts of California.

Oh, I was 9 for 9, but I'm a single parent of two, self-employed, and thus can have no other life.
Keith writes: Friday, May, 16, 2008 3:11 PM
Kim Dear
Interesting article. But Europe and Japan have something we don't have much of. NUCLEAR POWER!
gf writes: Saturday, May, 17, 2008 4:42 PM
Look in a mirror
And what exactly did our Republicans do when they controlled all three branches?
IGoCommando writes: Monday, May, 19, 2008 10:56 AM
Kimbers
"All I know is that whatever the GOP is whining about must be on the side of the angels, because if there were big money and waste going into the effort for maglev, then you can bet there was a Republican thug behind it pushing it further."

Wow, how could I not be sold after such a competent and well-articulated argument like that.

'The bad guys don't like it, so it must be good.'

It's a pity C-Span doesn't make those evil Republicans wear black hats, that way you could actually follow along.

Honestly Kimberly, you're not even a quarter as smart as you fancy yourself to be.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

About John Campbell

John Campbell is a member of the House Financial Services Committee, and has taken a leadership role in addressing the country's top economic issues. Campbell serves as a member of the Joint Economic Committee, and House Committee on the Budget. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Economics from UCLA and a Master's Degree in Taxation from USC.

Create You Own Blog on Townhall.com - IT'S EASY Search User Blogs on Townhall.com :: Where Your Opinion Counts
Young America
Young America's Foundation
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast