Wednesday, March 04, 2009
Posted by: John Campbell at 12:11 PM

Today, the Wall Street Journal featured an Editorial by Indiana Senator Evan Bayh regarding President Obama’s Omnibus Appropriations Bill.  He encourages a ‘No’ vote and a return to fiscal responsibility in Washington.

WSJ

Deficits and Fiscal Credibility

A Democratic senator says no to a huge federal spending bill.

By: Evan Bayh

This week, the United States Senate will vote on a spending package to fund the federal government for the remainder of this fiscal year. The Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009 is a sprawling, $410 billion compilation of nine spending measures that lacks the slightest hint of austerity from the federal government or the recipients of its largess.

The Senate should reject this bill. If we do not, President Barack Obama should veto it.

The omnibus increases discretionary spending by 8% over last fiscal year's levels, dwarfing the rate of inflation across a broad swath of issues including agriculture, financial services, foreign relations, energy and water programs, and legislative branch operations. Such increases might be appropriate for a nation flush with cash or unconcerned with fiscal prudence, but America is neither.

Drafted last year, the bill did not pass due to Congress's long-standing budgetary dysfunction and the frustrating delays it yields in our appropriations work. Since then, economic and fiscal circumstances have changed dramatically, which is why the Senate should go back to the drawing board. The economic downturn requires new policies, not more of the same.

Our nation's current fiscal imbalance is unprecedented, unsustainable and, if unaddressed, a major threat to our currency and our economic vitality. The national debt now exceeds $10 trillion. This is almost double what it was just eight years ago, and the debt is growing at a rate of about $1 million a minute.

Washington borrows from foreign creditors to fund its profligacy. The amount of U.S. debt held by countries such as China and Japan is at a historic high, with foreign investors holding half of America's publicly held debt. This dependence raises the specter that other nations will be able to influence our policies in ways antithetical to American interests. The more of our debt that foreign governments control, the more leverage they have on issues like trade, currency and national security. Massive debts owed to foreign creditors weaken our global influence, and threaten high inflation and steep tax increases for our children and grandchildren.

The solution going forward is to stop wasteful spending before it starts. Families and businesses are tightening their belts to make ends meet -- and Washington should too.

The omnibus debate is not merely a battle over last year's unfinished business, but the first indication of how we will shape our fiscal future. Spending should be held in check before taxes are raised, even on the wealthy. Most people are willing to do their duty by paying taxes, but they want to know that their money is going toward important priorities and won't be wasted.

Last week I was pleased to attend the president's White House Fiscal Responsibility Summit. It's about time we had a leader committed to addressing the deficit, and Mr. Obama deserves great credit for doing so. But what ultimately matters are not meetings or words, but actions. Those who vote for the omnibus this week -- after standing with the president and pledging to slice our deficit in half last week -- jeopardize their credibility.

As Indiana's governor, I balanced eight budgets, never raised taxes, and left the largest surplus in state history. It wasn't always easy. Cuts had to be made and some initiatives deferred. Occasionally I had to say "no."

But the bloated omnibus requires sacrifice from no one, least of all the government. It only exacerbates the problem and hastens the day of reckoning. Voters rightly demanded change in November's election, but this approach to spending represents business as usual in Washington, not the voters' mandate.

Now is the time to win back the confidence and trust of the American people. Congress should vote "no" on this omnibus and show working families across the country that we are as committed to living within our means as they are.

Mr. Bayh, a Democratic senator from Indiana, served as governor of Indiana from 1989 to 1997.



View in ascending order View in descending order
Patrick  writes: Wednesday, March, 04, 2009 12:34 PM
ARROGANCE FROM 17 SECURITIES ACCOUNTS
WILL PRESIDENT OBAMA EVER TAX THE KIND OF ACCOUNTS HE HAS HIS SEURITIES INVESTED IN? WILL PRESIDENT OBAMA EVER ELIMINATE THE FEDRAL TAX EXEMPTION FOR ALL ENTITIES IN THE UNITED STATES? WOULD THIS NOT PREVENT THE FUNDING OF ALL PREJUDICE IS THAT NOT THE VISION OF THE PEACE, UNITY, LOVE, NO WAR COALITION THAT HATE GOD, ETHICS AND MORALITY? COULD NOT ALL CIVIL SERVANTS HAVE TO HAVE DNA TEST AS A CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT FOR HEALTH REASONS IN A SOCIETY OF UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE? THAT ALLOWS THE SYSTEM TO BE AWARE OF THE THINGS NOT QUALIFIED FOR TREATMENT BY ALCOHOLICS, DRUG ADDICTS, GAY COALITION MEMBERS, PROSTITUTES, WHORE MONGERS AND THOSE PRACTICING SEXUAL DEVIANCY.
Kathy writes: Wednesday, March, 04, 2009 1:09 PM
Uh Oh!
Evan Byah made way too much sense in this article. Shame on you Evan, don't you know that now you are on top of Nancy Pelosi's "Hate" list?

Now, if we can just get other Democrats to follow your lead, we might just be able to rein in this notion of bankrupting our Nation.

I hope Evan stands his ground ans sticks to the priciples of fiscal responsibility.
vonryansexpress writes: Wednesday, March, 04, 2009 1:16 PM
I've been anticipating this for days ...
and posting about it.

Democrats that chafe under Pelosi and Reid and know that they'll lose their own seats come next election will rebel and bolt.

I've poster here twice over the past days my prediction that with the DOW meltdown and the crazed redistribution socialism there would be Democrats that would break ranks.

"If the DOW falls below five thousand, they'll be fury.

I think we'll see House Democrats begin to break with the program. They'll need to in order to salvage their chances at reelection.

We need to prompt and encourage those Democrats that chafe under the Pelosi/Hoyer rule to bolt.

We do this by targeting media time and buys in their districts. We ask those electorates if they like the freefall and diminutions of their pensions and portfolios. This stuff hits millions."

It is no wonder that starts with one such as Sen. Bayh. His state is core conservative. His own orientation is doggedly 'blue' and he has common sense.

This stops the free ride for the Obama Administration. We can find Democrats that love the country and want a normal body politic.

Bravo Sen. Bayh. I was unhappy with your vote against Condelezza Rice's confirmation to State, but this goes a long way to rehabilitate you in my view.
vonryansexpress writes: Wednesday, March, 04, 2009 1:22 PM
I've been anticipating this for days ...

and posting about it.

Democrats that chafe under Pelosi and Reid and know that they'll lose their own seats come next election will rebel and bolt.

I've posted here twice over the past days my prediction that with the DOW meltdown and the crazed redistribution socialism there would be Democrats that would break ranks.

"If the DOW falls below five thousand, they'll be fury.

I think we'll see House Democrats begin to break with the program. They'll need to in order to salvage their chances at reelection.

We need to prompt and encourage those Democrats that chafe under the Pelosi/Hoyer rule to bolt.

We do this by targeting media time and buys in their districts. We ask those electorates if they like the freefall and diminutions of their pensions and portfolios. This stuff hits millions."

It is no wonder that starts with one such as Sen. Bayh. His state is core conservative. His own orientation is doggedly 'blue' and he has common sense.

This stops the free ride for the Obama Administration. We can find Democrats that love the country and want a normal body politic.

Bravo Sen. Bayh. I was unhappy with your vote against Condelezza Rice's confirmation to State, but this goes a long way to rehabilitate you in my view.

Riders on the Storm writes: Wednesday, March, 04, 2009 1:36 PM
Sen. Bayh
Why did you vote for the stimulus bill then?
Seadog writes: Wednesday, March, 04, 2009 1:42 PM
I swore I'd never again vote for a
democrat when my then party nominated Clinton. I thought I would have to break that vow last year if Bayh had been the democrat candidate.

His father was highly thought of in Indiana and so is he. It is hard to fool the down-to-earth folks in Indiana. The only thing wrong with Indiana is Lake County!

Good man!
Bob Munck writes: Wednesday, March, 04, 2009 2:11 PM
Patrick 12:34 PM
"... ALCOHOLICS, DRUG ADDICTS, GAY COALITION MEMBERS, PROSTITUTES, WHORE MONGERS AND THOSE PRACTICING SEXUAL DEVIANCY."

The heck with Limbaugh; you should make Patrick the spokesman and leader of your party.
Brookit writes: Wednesday, March, 04, 2009 2:26 PM
You thought your taxes were high before?
your friend Obama just raised them again! $3.3 trillion in tax increases for the "Stimulus Bill" and now more for our enemies! Read below. LB
PS: I always thought charity began at home...and I don't mean big corporations who steal from us and then want a bail-out, because the investments they made "went south". It appears Mr. Obama see's it otherwise. "Change" and "Spread The Wealth" was his "mantra" during his campaign...it seems he's keeping his word...more taxes is the "Change" and he's giving it to someone else...that's the "Spread The Wealth" he told Joe The Plummer to expect!
PPS: Don't 'ya just love being "ripped-off"? That is what Democrat's do for a living you know!
Apollo writes: Wednesday, March, 04, 2009 9:31 PM
Evan Bayh?
I think the Republicans should trade Arlen Spector and cash for Evan Bayh and a player to be named later.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

About John Campbell

John Campbell is a member of the House Financial Services Committee, and has taken a leadership role in addressing the country's top economic issues. Campbell serves as a member of the Joint Economic Committee, and House Committee on the Budget. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Economics from UCLA and a Master's Degree in Taxation from USC.

Create You Own Blog on Townhall.com - IT'S EASY Search User Blogs on Townhall.com :: Where Your Opinion Counts
Young America
Young America's Foundation
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast