Thursday, December 06, 2007
Posted by: John Campbell at 2:03 PM

Upon the assumption of her role as Speaker of the House of Representatives, Speaker Nancy Pelosi stated,

“Bills should be developed following full hearings and open subcommittee and committee markups, with appropriate referrals to other committees. Members should have at least 24 hours to examine a bill prior to consideration at the subcommittee level. Bills should generally come to the floor under a procedure that allows open, full, and fair debate consisting of a full amendment process that grants the Minority the right to offer its alternatives, including a substitute. Members should have at least 24 hours to examine bill and conference report text prior to floor consideration. Rules governing floor debate must be reported before 10 p.m. for a bill to be considered the following day.” 

Today Speaker Pelosi brought forth an energy bill. No one had seen it before then. It has some good things, some OK things and some bad things. I will vote against it because I believe the bad outweighed the good. But the point here is that we need an energy bill to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and petroleum in general. But this bill, although it will pass the House, will not pass the Senate and if it did, the President has said he would veto it.

Again there was an opportunity to accomplish a lot in this area in which there is agreement. I certainly wouldn't get all I wanted, but I would get some. The Speaker and the President would also get some but not all of what they wanted. There is clear common ground.

It seems that the Democrat House leadership is more interested in making political statements than accomplishing anything.

Maybe the Senate can fix the bill.



View in ascending order View in descending order
johninoregon writes: Thursday, December, 06, 2007 11:21 PM
Illiterate, or just disrespectful?
"It seems that the Democrat House leadership is more interested in making political statements than accomplishing anything."

That would be "DEMOCRATIC House leadership," Congressman. If you're going to serve in the House, learn the name of the opposition party and have enough respect to use it correctly.
ctyankee writes: Friday, December, 07, 2007 9:37 AM
Clueless, or just brainwashed?
Dear johninoregon,

Whether the Democrat leadership or the Republican minority is making political statements is the reason I'm posting.

If you actually took the time to learn the grammar, you'd know that the congressman is correct. "Democratic" is a process, "Republic" is a form of government. A "Democrat" is a person and two or more could be Democrats. Another person might call himself a "Republican" and belong to the Republican Party, while the first person might associate himself with the Democrat Party.

I myself refuse to align myself with such primitive tribal notions as Party. The duopoly that it's produced is damaging the wellbeing of the nation, and so I call for a change. My belief is in personal liberty & responsibility. I loath, despise, and fear the nanny state, and the socialist programs that are taking hold. I condemn the actions we've taken on foreign soil, and I chastise the administration for failing to secure our borders. I'd call for the ouster of them all, but incumbency is a powerful adversary. And the alternative is the simple swapping for D
for R and R for D in most districts.

I'd suggest you re-examine the reasons for your alliance, buy given the nature of your statement, I sooner suggest that there be an intelligence test for all persons desiring to vote.

Just as the political process has devolved from a forum for ideas, into a popularity contest, it seems that your association with the party serves to decrease the average IQ of the party. With that said, perhaps you should avoid the Libertarian party, as they've still got some good ideas.
chuck writes: Friday, December, 07, 2007 10:26 AM
Johninoregon
He could have called it by its real name


DUMBOCRATIC HOUSE LEADERSHIP
Reason writes: Sunday, December, 09, 2007 4:18 AM
Missed chances
Maybe the Repub Party leadership sould have tackled this when they had the chance.
chuck writes: Monday, December, 10, 2007 11:46 AM
Reason
You mean like when CLINTON had a chance to get Osama (OBL) when he was in charge?
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

About John Campbell

John Campbell is a member of the House Financial Services Committee, and has taken a leadership role in addressing the country's top economic issues. Campbell serves as a member of the Joint Economic Committee, and House Committee on the Budget. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Economics from UCLA and a Master's Degree in Taxation from USC.

Create You Own Blog on Townhall.com - IT'S EASY Search User Blogs on Townhall.com :: Where Your Opinion Counts
Young America
Young America's Foundation
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
Listen Now Listen Now
Click to download Podcast Podcast